Taylor’s Scientific Management (Taylorism) is
based on induction and adopts a pragmatic and empiricist method, and its “there
has to be a best way to do a certain job” principle has advanced among the
others. This principle has inevitably reached to the time and motion study, the
equation of employees with machines and finally automation and robot science. Although Taylor made great contributions to the
management as a science, he received harsh criticisms as well (Turan, 2015)
Scientific management eliminated the need for skilled
labor by delegating each employee one simple task to repeat over and over.
Although this method increased the productivity of factories, it stripped
employees their freedom to choose their work, as well as how it should be done. (Ireh, 2016) . Scientific
management, although stressed people post match, more focus on jobs, rather
than people, each post have standardized operation process and method, the
workers have to do is training well according to the standard operation
procedure to finish work, but in today's knowledge economy era, the staff
engaged in mental labour, have no fixed standardization process, practice of
this management mode. Therefore, we should pay more attention to the role of
human beings, formulate corresponding incentives, maximize the potential of
people, and enhance the competitiveness of organizations (Su, 2017)
However Taylorism could also be seen as a
management theory that analyzes work flows to improve economic efficiency,
especially labor productivity. This management theory was dominant in
manufacturing industries in the 1880s and 1890s. (Ioana et al., 2014) . One of the best
examples is the adoption of this theory in Ford company in 20th
century. After the adoption, the
assembly-line process enabled Ford to produce cars more quickly, and at more
affordable rates and by 1924, as a result of this advanced production methods,
Ford had sold 10 million Model Ts. (Saylor, 2005)
In conclusion, at a time when labor was cheap,
supplies were plentiful, and manufacturing processes were relatively forgiving
of quality control issues, scientific management was a tremendous improvement
over the old factory systems with its tyrannical foremen and rules of thumb (Koumparoulis & Vlachopoulioti, 2012) . However, it is
known that progress relates to man’s qualities and that scientific management
could not be considered, as a means for human betterment, in the long run. Criticism
of scientific management is justified by the opinion that it could be a
dangerous hindrance to progress (Caldari, 2007) . Is scientific management a perfect system? No.
However, one cannot deny its contributions to society and measurement of efficiency (Koumparoulis &
Vlachopoulioti, 2012)
Reference list
Caldari, K., 2007.
Alfred Marshall’s critical analysis of scientific management. The European
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14(1), pp.74-75.
Ioana, A.,
Marinică, A., Semenescu, A. & Preda, C.F., 2014. Elements of Administrative
Management Decision. International Journal of Management Science, 1(1),
p.27.
Ireh, M.,
2016. Scientific Management. Winston Salem.
Koumparoulis,
D.N. & Vlachopoulioti, A., 2012. The Evolution of Scientific Management. Academic
Research International, 3(2), p.425.
Saylor, 2005.
Scientific Management Theory and the Ford Motor Company. The Saylor
Foundation, pp.3-4.
Su, Y., 2017.
Taylor Scientific Management Theory Carding and Significance of Organization
Management. Social Sciences, 6(4), p.106.
Turan, H., 2015. Taylor’s
“Scientific Management Principles”: Contemporary Issues in Personnel Selection
Period. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(11), p.1102.